College Alcohol Study HSPH
Sign Up



Perception and Reality: A National Evaluation of Social Norms Marketing Interventions to Reduce College Students' Heavy Alcohol Use

Press Release   |   Abstract   |   Article   |   Letter to the Community

Objective: To evaluate a widely used intervention to reduce college student alcohol use, we studied student drinking patterns at colleges that employed social-norms marketing programs and those that did not.

Method: We examined responses of students in the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study (CAS) 1997, 1999, and 2001 data sets at 37 colleges that employed social norms marketing programs and at 61 that did not. Information about the studentsí drinking behavior and their familiarity with social-norms marketing messages at their schools was analyzed, as were college administratorsí reports about the implementation of social-norms marketing campaigns. Schools were grouped on the basis of student reports of exposure to programmatic materials. Trend analyses were conducted on seven standard measures of alcohol consumption, including annual and 30- day use, frequency, usual quantity and volume consumed, heavy episodic use, and drunkenness.

Results: Almost half of the CAS colleges sampled adopted social-norms programs. Those that did were more likely to have large enrollments, not be religiously affiliated, and have high rates of alcohol use. No decreases were noted in any of the seven measures of alcohol use at schools with social-norms programs, even when student exposure and length of program existence were considered. Increases in measures of monthly alcohol use and total volume consumed were observed at schools employing social-norms programs.

Conclusions: The current study does not provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of social-norms marketing programs, as currently utilized, in reducing alcohol use among college students.

Wechsler H, Nelson TF, Lee JE, Seibring M, Lewis C, Keeling RP.

Original Publication:
Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2003; 64(4): 484-494.